






 |
Learning about Learning: A Focus
on Problem-Based Learning in Distance Education
The objectives of the research were:
(i) to engage academic staff members of the Open University of
Hong Kong in a series of collaborative, cross-discipline action research
projects, and
(ii) to contribute significant information about problem-based
learning in distance education in Hong Kong at a time when this approach
to learning is becoming increasingly important
Monthly lunch meetings were held throughout the project. There were
fourteen regular participants who are Course Co-ordinators in discipline
areas including business management, accounting, English, Chinese, marketing,
mathematics, nursing and health. Participants engaged in workshops, presentations
and discussions about issues relating to PBL in general, and more specifically
in distance education and in their particular courses. In addition to internal
training within OUHK, participants were encouraged to participate in PBL
workshops organized by other tertiary institutions, particularly the series
run by the UGC PBL team based at the University of Hong Kong. Exchange
of views on PBL were enhanced by the fact that groups of project participants
attended these external workshops together.
Five small-scale action research investigations were conducted by staff
working either individually or collaboratively to investigate issues of
common concern. These involved 10 of the 14 participants. Because
of the scheduling of the courses in which they wanted to focus their research,
two more participants were unable to carry out their own projects during
the first year, but have developed proposals for the second year based
on their reflections during the workshops and questions raised in their
own research. Bridget Swearse developed and implemented a series
of situation-based TMA questions for Nursing students and monitored the
key learning issues that have arisen from these. Mabel Lam used problem-based
TMAs in B406 Auditing and interviewed students and tutors about their perceptions
of the learning that occurred and the students' perceptions of themselves
as independent learners. May Chan and Irene Siaw combined to conduct
a series of problem-based statistics tutorials and monitored the students'
acceptance of the approach. A similar project was conducted with a Chinese
Language course by Peggy Kwok, Susannah Chu, Annie Lee and Angela Leung.
The most common patterns resulting from the 1st cycle projects are summarised
below.
The Students
The majority of the students were positive about the knowledge and
skills they developed from the problem-solving activities but adamant that
it should be a component of their courses, rather than the only approach.
There were some patterns in the aspects of their PBL experiences that the
students responded to positively:
-
opportunities for discussion and sharing of ideas with peers,
-
achievement of success in solving problems that are challenging but within
the students' reach,
-
reflection on new knowledge and skills that have developed during the problem
solving, so they are aware that learning is taking place,
-
recognition that the tasks are relevant to their current or future 'real
world' needs,
-
feedback and support from the facilitators to deal with their feelings
of frustration and confusion when the problem-solving process became difficult.
As predicted, there were some tensions:
-
students' dependence on the tutor, particularly in the early stages of
the PBL projects,
-
students' concern with the quantity more than with the quality of what
they were learning and fear that they would learn less through PBL,
-
students' concern that with PBL they might get 'off track' and 'waste time'.
Instructors' Professional Development Needs
Some of the common responses from the participants are described below.
Participants generally regard PBL as a valuable educational strategy because
it can equip students with critical thinking, creativity and the necessary
knowledge, skills and attitudes to face problems,
It is important to give support as they go through early stages of confusion
and uncertainty about implementing PBL. Some participants admitted
that they did not enjoy the workshops at first. In spite of their enthusiasm
that the approach would be valuable for their students, they were unclear
about the concept and nature of PBL. Some even expressed initial frustration,
because they expected that the facilitator would give them answers in the
workshop, instead of asking them to find their own answers through discussion
and reading. However, as they began to find the answers that they needed
in the discussions, they became more motivated in the workshops and were
more willing to try out PBL in their courses.
It is necessary to address and discuss strategies for overcoming potential
obstacles to introducing PBL in distance education:
changing course materials is a complex process that requires the consensus
of the whole course team and the external course assessor,
there are only four or five tutorials per course per semester and it is
optional for students to attend these tutorials - need to create a balance
so the adoption of a PBL approach will still allow time to cover the main
objectives of the tutorials, namely to help students with their assignments
and revision,
it is necessary to address potential resistance from students to PBL, particularly
those who are typically passive learners who frequently express a need
to be organised by others.
A culture of collegial cross-discipline discussion and mutual support,
as established in this project, is highly desirable.
As can be seen from this brief summary, there were two main areas of concern
for the project participants. About half of them had no previous
knowledge about PBL, so a large part of the year has been taken up with
their coming to terms with what it is, how it can be implemented, and the
strategies that need to be applied if it is to be used successfully.
The other major concern was whether OUHK students would accept this kind
of approach when they are typically accustomed to instructor-centred learning.
It was necessary and important that these issues be investigated before
further attempts to implement PBL could be made. With generally positive
responses from the students who experienced PBL in various ways, the participants
now feel more confident to explore further how it can be used.
Because the OUHK situation is unique in that the geographical distance
separating students from the university is small, distance education at
OUHK is a combination of 'distance' and face-to-face delivery, it is necessary
to explore the role of PBL within this interface. In the first cycle, in
most cases, the initial explorations involved presenting PBL in face-to-face
mode. Thus three of the projects were centered around tutorials.
At this stage there has not been very much attention paid to the actual
distance learning environment and ways in which PBL can be incorporated
into this. Overall, the participants have expressed the belief that
the first cycle has been a successful experiment. The original objectives
have been achieved. Now that the first-level questions have been
answered with some degree of satisfaction, a core group of six staff members
has developed a proposal for the second cycle of investigations to explore
the questions that have arisen.
In the second cycle, particular attention will be paid to the ways in which
the distance learning environment can enhance and/or inhibit the successful
incorporation of PBL. Issues currently under investigation in the
second cycle include:
the utilisation of on-line discussions to create PBL environments, and
the nature and role of peer support and interaction in these environments,
the potential role of PBL in tutorials designed to help students complete
assignments,
the role of the tutor in the PBL environment,
students' metacognition of PBL processes,
analysis of existing course materials to investigate opportunities for
incorporating PBL.
Publications:
Taplin, M.
, Chan, M.S.C., Chu, W.W., Kwok, S.K., Lam, M., Lee,
A.O.N., Leung, A., Siaw, I.S.C. (In press for 1999)
Problem-Based Learning
and the Adult Distance Education Student in HongKong. Staff and
Educational Development International, December issue.
Taplin, M. & Leung, A. (1999). 'The role
of problem-based learning in
distance education'. In Ding Xingfu (Ed.) Proceedings of the 13th
Annual
Conference of the Asian Association of Open Universities, Beijing,
14th-17th October, Vol. 2, pp.175-189.
Taplin, M., Chan, M.S.C., Chu,
W.W., Kwok, S.K., Lam, M., Lee, A.O.N.,
Leung, A., Siaw, I.S.C. (1999). 'Problem-based learning and the Hong Kong
student', Open Education Research, Vol. 4., 33-36. (Translated by the
Editors into Chinese)
Siaw, I., Chan, M. & Mok, V. (1999).
PBL in the Distance Education
Tutorial. Paper presented at the 1st Asia-Pacific Conference on
Problem-Based Learning. Hong Kong, 9-11 December.
Lam, M. & Aylward, L. (1999). Use of Instructional Design to Drive PBL.
Paper presented at the 1st Asia-Pacific Conference on Problem-Based
Learning. Hong Kong, 9-11 December.
Taplin, M. & Jegede, O. (1999).
'Learning about Learning: A Focus on
Problem-Based Learning in Distance Education'. In I. Hoyer (Ed.). The New
educational Frontier: Teaching and Learning in a Networked World.
Proceedings (on CD ROM) of the International Conference on Distance
Education, Vienna, Austria, June 20-24.
Taplin, M. & Leung, A. (1998).
Learning about learning: a focus on
problem-based learning in distance education. The Asian Distance Learner:
Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the Asian Association of Open
Universities, The Open University of Hong Kong, 4-6 November, pp. 410-418.
Taplin, M. & Tsui, C. (1999).
Student responses to on-line PBL. Paper
presented at the 1st Asia-Pacific Conference on Problem-Based Learning.
Hong Kong, 9-11 December.
Leung, A., Taplin, M. & Yum, J.
(1999). 'Problem-based Learning in
Distance Education: Staff Development Through Action Research'. Paper
presented at the International Conference on New Professionalism in
Teaching: Teacher Education and Teacher Development in a Changing World,
organised by Hong Kong Institute of Educational Research and Faculty of
Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong in collaboration with the
International Research Network 'PACT' (Professional Actions and Cultures
of Teaching).
Back to Projects
Page |