|
Extension
Services in Japan after the World War II
After
the World War II, agricultural and rural development policy
was carried out through enhancing productivity and better
life to democratize the society and economy. In 1948,
agricultural extension service programme was introduced
and in 1949 improvement of living conditions service was
added by the enactment of the Agricultural Improvement
Promotion Law. The importance attached to extension service
was to bridge the gap between the state experiment as
well as research institutions and individual farmers.
Diffusing scientific knowledge of agricultural production
and everyday life were pursued. Agricultural cooperatives
and the joint programmes between
Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAF) and
prefectural governments were the two
driving forces to carry out the objectives.
The
joint programme was organized by extension staff posted
at extension centres of prefectures and technical experts
posted at extension centres of prefecture and MAF. The
technical experts trained the extension staff and the
extension staff visited villages. It is notable that the
extension centres of prefectures had various functions
of coordination; 1) coordination among staff activities,
2) planning, 3) coordination among municipalities and
production groups, 4) collection and supply of information
about agriculture and rural life of farmers, 5) encouraging
new comers, and 6) research and analysis to accumulate
scientific data on soil, plant growth etc.
In
1998 total number of staff were 10,604 covering 510 extension
centres in 47 prefectural government bodies. It is pointed
out that linkage between the staff and farmers has been
well established at the grass root level.
Agricultural
Extension and Improvement of Living Conditions through
Radio Programme
As
stated above, land reform, democratization of agricultural
cooperatives and agricultural extension programme were
three main pillars that promoted democratization of Japanese
rural society. Through the innovative technical guidance,
bringing up the farmers who thought and acted on one's
own initiative and educating farmers concerning democracy
were pursued. Radio broadcasting and printed materials
were utilized to achieve the purpose of the agricultural
extension programme. This was effective, since by the
end of the 1950s a radio set came into wide use in farm
households.
Table
3 shows that radio programmes chosen by rural population
of Niiharu village in Gunma prefecture (see 3-5.). 70
per cent of the respondents gave first priority to news
and 27 per cent of them chose weather forecast secondarily.
Farm household hour was third in order. Extension staff
saw the necessity of giving farmers and rural youth basic
knowledge of meteorology or agricultural science to supplement
radio programmes.
It
is notable that through group listening, promoters of
agricultural extension grew up. In Nigata prefecture,
for instance, among radio programmes broadcast for farm
households, the programme entitled techniques of living
was a good example that encouraged group listening. After
the radio programmes of two years (6:30-6:45
in the Friday and Saturday morning from 1961 to 1962)was
over, the members of the listening group formed an association
to improve living conditions under the guidance of extension
staff. Moreover, from the association able leaders of
improving living condition had come forth in large numbers
(JICA, 2001).
A
Nonformal Organized Class under the Framework of Social
Education and Radio Groups
In
order to illustrate radio group's achievement, an agricultural
youth class held by the board of education in Niiharu
village is worthy of note. Table 4 shows that in 1951,
33 per cent of the adult population in the village got
only elementary education and 56 per cent received secondary
education. Less than 25 per cent of the aged group went
to upper secondary education, viz., high school (Board
of Education, 1965). The agricultural youth class succeeded
in developing human resources through effective vocational
training and providing supplementary courses to lower
secondary school.
State
and local governments started promoting the several social
education programmes to provide learning opportunities.
Local public organizations or citizen's public halls and
other social education facilities started to give various
classes and lectures. Under the plan, after two years’ preparation
the board of education decided and in 1952 the managing
committee for the citizen's public hall started classes
for village youth between the ages of fifteen to eighteen.
The
objective was to provide the youth who chose farming with
basic knowledge of farm management and farming techniques.
To bring up the backbone of farmers in the locality was
also aimed at. Classes were held every Saturday from 8:40
to 17:15 (in winter 9:00 to 16:40). Students had to attend
classes forty-five days a year and left the school after
three years’ attendance. The part-time lecturers were a
principal and teachers of an academic high school, teachers
of an agricultural high school as well as a commercial
high school, agricultural extension staff, a car mechanics
and the alumnae. For general education course, the same
textbooks used by the academic high school were chosen
and for agricultural course ones used by the agricultural
high school were taken up. It is notable that textbooks
for Japan Broadcasting Corporation were used since 1962.
Table 5 shows that about 13 per cent of the total school
hours were occupied by group listening in the classrooms.
Students were asked to listen to the radio programme for
rural youth at home. In the classrooms, students made
efforts to understand the contents fully through listening
to the recorded programme once again.
As
table 6 shows, the enrollment ratio reached 100 per cent
in 1959 and started to decline. The number of enrollment
decreased because the steady drain of rural youth to non-agricultural
sectors in cities during high economic growth period of
the 1960s. As table 1 shows, the enrollment ratio of secondary
school has reached about 83 in 1965, when the unique class
for rural youth was closed. Budget per student was comparatively
low (see table 7). The project was highly evaluated as
the two main objectives were fulfilled (Board of Education,
1965).
Notes
1.
'Group listening’ (radio groups) was a form of education.
Organized groups listen to some educational programmes.
The following are general factors to define group listening
(Kurota: 152-153): regular programmes are maintained, listeners have common living environment, the
organizers lead the groups, the radio is placed in public
space of easy access.
2.
A technical continuation school was organized by
the elementary school law of 1890 and provided upper elementary
education. The period of attendance was less than three
years and facilities for elementary education were utilized.
3.
The Fundamental Law of Education 1947(Law No. 25),
Article 6 School Education: The schools prescribed by
law shall be public nature and, besides the state and
local public bodies, only the juridical persons prescribed
by law shall be entitled to establish such schools.
4.
Teachers of the schools prescribed by law shall
be servants of whole community. They shall be conscious
of their mission and endeavour to discharge their duties.
For this purpose, the status of teachers shall be respected
and their fair and appropriate treatment shall be secured’ (Research
and Statistics Planning Division, 2000).
5.
Number of citizen' public halls in Gunma Prefecture
(2000) is as follows.
City Town
Village
Total
Number
of Local Govt.
11
30
25
66
Number
of Public Hall
125
57
29
211
Table
1 Historical trend in enrollment in Japan
|
1875
1895
1905
1915
1925
1935
1947
1955
1965
1975
1985
1995
1998
%
%
% % %
%
%
%
%
%
% %
%
Elementary
Education
35.2
61.2
95.6
98.5
99.4
99.6
99.8
99.8
99.8
99.9 99.9
99.9
99.9
Secondary Education
0.7 1.1
4.3
19.9
32.3
39.7
61.7
78.0
82.7
95.3 96.3
97.0
97.4
Higher Education
0.4
0.3
0.9 1.0
2.5
3.0
5.8
8.8 14.6
30.3 32.1
37.1
42.0
|
Note:
Upper elementary schools are counted as secondary school
enrollment.
Source: (Research: 18).
Table
2: Changes in the percentage distribution of enrolment educational
level in Japan
|
Educational
career ended at
Population
With
no
Year (1
5~6
4)
Compulsory
Upper Secondary
Higher School
years
old
Education
Education Education
Education
|
|
1950 49,670
thousand
80.7 %
14.3 %
2.9
%
2.1
%
60 59,930
69.3
24.6
5.4
0.7
70 71,530
56.7
34.1
8.9
0.3
80 78,720
42.0
43.0
14.8
0.2
90 84,960
32.0
46.4
21.5
0.1
Note:
Not including those whose educational background
is not identified.
Source: (Research: 20).
|
Table
3: Radio
programmes chosen in order of preference by the head of
household of
Niiharu village
|
News
Weather forecast
Leisure
Farm household hour
Culture
Sports Children hour
|
|
|
|
1.
70
16
7.3
2.6
0.9
0.9
2 .
18
27
19
17
4
3.5 3
3 .
5
17
25
25
11
7
8
4
.
1
10
23
25
11
9
14
5 .
0.6
13
13.4
31
11 25
Source:
(Board: 146)
Table 4
: Educational background of the adult population
in Niiharu village
(31
/ 8 / 1951)
Male
Female Total
No.
Education
19
45 64
Elementary
733
793
1,526
Secondary
1,271
1,335
2,606
Upper secondary
242
202
444
Higher
17
1
18
Total
2,282
2,376 4,658
Source:
(Board: 148)
Table 5:
Curriculum and study road of the youth school
in1964
(hours)
|
Class
1
Class 2
Class 3
Remarks
|
|
Fertilizer
36
36
36
Agriculture
36
36
36
Radio
course 1
12
12
12
Radio
course 2
12
12
12
Forestry
24
24
24
Livestock
12
12
12
(Training
72
72
72) for
male only
Group
study
48
48
48
Total
180
180
180
|
Note:
Radio course 1 is agricultural meteorology.
Source: (Board: 211).
Table
6: The
ratio of students going on to high schools in Niiharu
village and enrollment ratio of agricultural youth
class
|
1955 |
1956 |
1957 |
1958 |
1959 |
1960 |
1961 |
1962 |
1963 |
1964 |
| No.
of graduates |
244 |
247 |
227 |
224 |
192 |
144 |
219 |
293 |
259 |
|
| High
School |
41(17%) |
64(26%) |
65(29%) |
48(21%) |
53(28%) |
60(42%) |
76(35%) |
111(38%) |
119(52%) |
|
| Jobs
outside village |
106(43%) |
89(36%) |
74(33%) |
97(43%) |
81(42%) |
52(36%) |
115(52%) |
115(35%) |
100(36%) |
|
| Farming
inside village(a) |
82(34%) |
89(36%) |
53(23%) |
45(20%) |
33(17%) |
16(11%) |
20(9%) |
21(7%) |
(8%) |
|
| Non-farming
inside village |
7 |
5 |
8 |
8 |
7 |
5 |
6 |
45 |
11 |
|
| Others |
8 |
4 |
27 |
26 |
18 |
11 |
3 |
1 |
8 |
|
| No.
of enrollment(b) |
48 |
48 |
52*(4) |
40*(1) |
33*(1) |
11*(1) |
16 |
14 |
14*(5) |
|
| Ratio
(b)/(a)X100 |
59% |
54% |
98% |
89% |
100% |
70% |
80%(79)** |
67%(81)** |
67%(51)** |
(69)** |
Note:Excluding
*outside the village and outside the prefecture. No.
of students from outside shown in ().
Source:
(Board:128)
|
Table 7:
Budget for agricultural youth class (Yen,
currency rate; US$1=360yen)
|
1952
|
1953
|
1954
|
1955
|
1956
|
1957
|
1958
|
1959
|
1960
|
1961
|
1962
|
1963
|
| State
subsidy |
|
31500
|
6300
|
5700
|
60000
|
8000
|
|
50000
|
20000
|
30000
|
30000
|
50000
|
| Prefectural
subsidy |
|
|
|
1000
|
|
|
50000
|
|
16000
|
20000
|
20000
|
40000
|
| Village |
121737
|
148008
|
175006
|
196114
|
257812
|
327340
|
4479301
|
405967
|
529954
|
450861
|
424190
|
448914
|
| Total |
121737
|
179508
|
181306
|
202814
|
317812
|
335340
|
4529301
|
455967
|
565954
|
400861
|
474190
|
538914
|
| No.
of Student |
62
|
90
|
101
|
103
|
97
|
123
|
107
|
103
|
82
|
56
|
35
|
34
|
| Budget
per student |
1963
|
1994
|
1795
|
1969
|
3276
|
2726
|
42329
|
4426
|
6901
|
8051
|
13548
|
15850
|
Note:
No. of students includes non-enrollment course students..
Source:
(Board:127) |